Cities Move to Disconnect AI-Powered Surveillance Networks
From California to Wisconsin, a growing number of municipalities are severing ties with Flock Safety, the surveillance firm behind tens of thousands of automated license plate readers. The backlash signals a rare moment of nonpartisan consensus against the unchecked expansion of high-tech tracking in American public life.
The technology, which catalogs everything from vehicle models to bumper stickers and individual scratches, is currently deployed across 5,000 law enforcement agencies. According to the ACLU, these devices perform over 20 billion scans every month, funneling personal movement data into massive databases accessible to police without a warrant. While marketed for standard law enforcement, the systems have increasingly been repurposed for tracking protest activity and monitoring interstate travel for abortion care or immigration enforcement.
Opposition to the surveillance grid has intensified as reports of data insecurity emerge. Cybersecurity firm Hudson Rock recently identified that hackers successfully compromised at least 35 customer accounts, exposing sensitive data to potential misuse. This vulnerability, coupled with concerns over civil liberties, has led to 82 contract terminations across 28 states since 2021. In Santa Cruz, California, officials moved to end their partnership after discovering that local police were sharing data with a national network in violation of state law. Federal lawmakers, including Representatives Robert Garcia and Raja Krishnamoorthi, have launched investigations into the company's practices, while bipartisan legislative efforts are underway to restrict the use of federal highway funds for such non-toll surveillance technologies.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first!