Enterprises Face Massive Security Blind Spots as Agentic Attacks Surge
Nearly 40% of threats identified as relevant by organizations currently lack any working defensive coverage. New research from Conifers, which analyzed over 14,000 detections in live environments, reveals that security teams are significantly overestimating their protection levels by relying on raw rule counts rather than verified, functional detection logic.

The report, titled The Detection Blind Spot, highlights a critical disconnect between the threats companies anticipate and their ability to stop them. While organizations often assume that deploying a tool or rule equates to security, the study found that 47% of existing detections require intervention to function as intended. These faulty rules often masquerade as healthy in traditional inventory reporting, creating a false sense of safety while leaving critical MITRE ATT&CK techniques exposed.
Security teams frequently struggle with vendor-managed detections in endpoint, cloud, and identity tools. When these proprietary rules fail or generate excessive noise, analysts are often unable to modify the underlying logic, forcing them to either suppress the alerts or ignore them entirely. This operational gap is exacerbated by the rise of agentic adversaries, who exploit these vulnerabilities with speed and scale that manual, periodic reviews cannot match.
To bridge this divide, experts suggest moving beyond simple volume metrics. Conifers CEO Tom Findling argues that security must shift toward continuous validation, where threat intelligence and detection engineering function as a single, unified system. The research emphasizes that teams should prioritize verified coverage mapped directly to crown-jewel assets rather than relying on the sheer number of tools onboarded.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first!